Archive for the ‘Broadband’ category

A New Age of ENG

April 28th, 2012

So last year at NAB I saw two companies showing off Cellular Bonding technology, this year there were quite a few showing it off. I even attended a seminar on it and I heard that CNN is only using it for remote broadcasts.

What it is of course is tying several different cellular networks together (bonding) to create a larger data pipe than any one cellular network could provide. They use to do this in the old days with multiple dial-up modems. Now with this larger data pipe you can compress an Audio/Video feed and send it over that pipe back to the station. Much cheaper than a full-blown ENG truck with the associated microwave receivers and dishes.

Its being used right now to stream live video and audio from protests in the middle East as well as many other live events. 3G and 4G are being used, you just have to sign up for a data plan, usual from various Cellular providers to increase the likelihood of getting a signal and there being available bandwidth.

Some of the problems associated with Cellular Bonding is that you are using a system never designed to carry such large amounts of  realtime data, and there’s no QoS (Quality of Service) so you never know how good the link is. Any event that brings out a news crew is bound to bring more than one and with them will be John and Jane Q. Public also taking pictures and video and uploading them to social media sites. All these means your going to be competing with everyone else at the event for the available bandwidth of the cellular data networks.

Most of the new entries to the Cellular Bonding market used very small boxes, they fit right on top of the camera, about the size of a paper back book (like a Kindle but made of paper). Then I go over to StreamBox, who I saw last year, and see that they have a full backpack for their Cellular Bonding / Encoding setup. So I ask them why is their’s so big?

Brian from StreamBox explained that their system has several advantages over the other, smaller systems. First is their encoder, it’s integrated with the cellular bonding technology in that to two talk to each other. As the bandwidth changes, due to network activity or signal strength, the encoder can dynamically change they way in which the video and audio are encoded making for much better pictures under changing circumstances. Plus they use a one touch encoding selection system, this allow the non-technical operator to choose a low latency connection for faster video streaming or higher quality which many times entails more latency, all at the touch of a button.

StreamBox Extender

Another feature is the use of the range extender kit, this consists of a box to hold the Cellular Network adapters as well as power amplifiers for both G3 and G4 networks. Theres also a telescopic mast that allows for mounting the combined antenna, getting it above the crowd.Together this extends the range of the system to several miles, well beyond your typical cel phone, it’s even been used on a moving train.

Newer systems from companies like TVU will incorporate both Cellular Bonding and ASI out to directly feed an ENG Trunk after it has been setup. While others promise to use both cellular and WiFi to expand the bandwidth even more. Panasonic is looking to put Cellular bonding directly into their cameras. And JVC now has FTP upload ability into their camera.

It will only get more interesting.

 

Be the first to like.
Share

Whats really in the Broadcast Spectrum Auction Bill?

March 2nd, 2012

I am a proud member of SBE Chapter 40 in San Francisco, even if I don’t attend many of the meetings. But I was at the latest meeting the other day and I am glad I was there to hear what was said. A couple of members told us what they found in the “Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012″ or its official name HR3630.

It seem a couple of extras were thrown in at the last-minute. The one closest to Broadcasters hearts is a small provision in SEC. 6409  WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT. This prevents local governments from denying modifications to wireless towers (i.e. Broadcast Towers) that  ”does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower“. So, if you want to add as side mount antenna or a dish it would seem you can’t be denied, Federal law supersedes all others. This provision states that it applies to “ (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment”. This would seem to make life a little easier when tower changes are needed. See your FCC lawyer for details.

Another little item is SEC. 6408.  ”STUDY ON RECEIVER PERFORMANCE AND SPECTRUM EFFICIENCY”. This sounds like it pertains to DTV receivers or some such but it’s real goal is to keep LightSquared alive. It states;

The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to consider efforts to ensure that each transmission system is designed and operated so that reasonable use of adjacent spectrum does not excessively impair the functioning of such system.

As you might have read recently that LightSquared was shot out of the water by poorly designed GPS equipment what would have received the LightSquared signals (that are within their purchased band) and interfered with their operation. Instead of fixing the GPS equipment that operated outside of the GPS band LightSquared was told they can’t use the spectrum they purchased. This seems to be an end run around the FCC ruling to get the Comptroller General to do it’s own test to make sure the offending GPS receivers stay within their own band. The good thing for Broadcasters is that LightSquared offers wireless data service without using any Broadcast Spectrum, more power to them.

Another item caught my eye and that was, SEC. 6407. GUARD BANDS AND UNLICENSED USE. It seems to say that the guard bands between licensed bands can have unlicensed users in them. If it’s a guard band why would they allow anyone in there?

Well to read all this your self you can download a PDF copy from The Library of Congress.

 

1 person likes this post.
Share

The Evolution of Delivering Television

February 16th, 2012

In the past the only way for people to watch a television show was with a pair of Rabbit Ears on top of their set, since then there have been many changes and additions to that path. The first one was CATV or Community Antenna Television, where communities that could not receive over-the-air broadcasts put up a common antenna that able to receive the broadcast signals. And then and using amplifiers and coax cable feeds to the community homes it provided over-the-air TV via cable.

Then in the early mid 60′s the idea of cable only channels sprang up and in 1974 HBO was born, and since then more and more  cable only channels have filled your local cable feed as well as your cable bill. With these cable only channels the cable company was making money selling them to their customers, and started dropping the unprofitable local over-the-air broadcast channels. The FCC imposed “Must Carry” rules to protect local television stations, insisting that if a station could put a strong enough signal over a city the local cable company must carry it on their system. This rule was struck down several times by the courts until 1997 when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Must Carry.

Cable started with just 12 to 24 channels but has grown to several hundred channels on some systems. Currently almost all cable systems are phasing out analog channel in favor of all digital. They can fit 3 or more digital channels in the space of one analog. But this also means compression, coax cable has a finite bandwidth and if they want two or three hundred channels on one coax something has to get compressed. They are doing better with F/O feeds to neighborhood nodes where its converted to RF and then sent into the home but they keep adding things and services onto their feed like high speed internet and such.

Of course DBS or Direct Broadcast Satellite came a few years later. With cable all the cost was in putting in coax cable all over a city or region, the DBS guys spent all their money on satellites. Satellite works well but to compete with cable they had to offer much the same programing and that means compression. They have a limited bandwidth and can only get so many program streams into it.

The real irony is that most cable companies charge for HD programing, even if it’s local television stations. And most viewers still watch prime time network shows that they can watch for free off the air. If only they would put up an antenna. My Tivo has both cable and Antenna inputs which I use.

Now with the proliferation of broadband to the home people are streaming video to watch. The first iteration of this was IPTV, where dedicated data lines to the home allowed families to watch streaming video. This never became very popular as those dedicated lines cost a lot to put in back then.

Now people use Netflix, Hulu and others to get the shows they want to watch over the internet and they are not stuck sitting around the computer monitor anymore. My sister set up a Netflix account and was watching movies on her Mac Book, she told me of going to a store and getting a cable to connect her Mac Book to her TV. It was awkward but it worked for her. When she told me about this arrangement I told her to get an Apple TV.  It’s the size of a hockey puck and only has four connections; AC in, HDMI out, Optical audio out and a network connector. It streams from Netflix and others but best of all it will play music and movies from you iTunes library ( I have over 900 movies in mine).

But there are others out there like Roku and Boxee, both are considered OTT or Over the Top boxes (as is Apple TV) that allow for wide bandwidth video streaming over the top of your normal internet data. AT&T’s U-verse is not quite the same as they are more like the old IPTV. It’s IP video but it all comes from AT&T equipment at the other end of the wires going to your house, not from the wider internet. But that IP video is what allows them to record your shows on their servers for you to play back later, something normal cable does not offer.

It’s rumored that Boxee is going to add an Over-The-Air tuner to a future unit to allow watching local broadcasts.

As I see it one day OTT will replace Over-The-Air broadcasts, but not today. Once Broadband to the home is considered the same as electricity and water then it could happen. But right now it fill a huge need for the public to receive free information, news and entertainment. It also keeps the other pay for programing companies in check as they know the public can get free TV.

And thats what the Cord Cutters are doing, either cutting off cable completely or reducing the amount of paid programing (HBO, Showtime, …) and putting up an antenna and streaming OTT programing. With my TIVO and Apple TV I am a happy camper, I get my extend basic cable, free over the air local broadcasts and get the rest from my Apple TV.

I should also mention that by putting up an antenna you also receive all the channels the your local television stations broadcast, cable only gives you what they want. In many places around the country an antenna gets you 50 or more channels to watch.

4 people like this post.
Share

VM in the Broadcast Facility

February 14th, 2012

I had a chance to talk with a former Radio turned TV IT guy today. He was telling me about installing VMWear at the transmitter. This sounded interesting and I asked him to explain. First a little background.

If you don’t know VM or Virtual Machine is a process where you run software on a computer that simulates one or more other computers. You may have seen VM used on a Macintosh computer allowing it to run Windows software. The hardware on a Mac is not the same as a PC and the VM software allows Windows to run on the Mac. This is one example of VM.

VM started back in the 60′s with IBM mainframes, they cost a lot and to make it do more work the machine and software were made to ‘time slice’ different processes, allowing the computer to run several processes at one time. I remember this on the mainframe at San Francisco City College where a room full of teletype machines were all connected to the the college’s computer. Back then it was Time-sharing, each terminal got a slice of time from the computer. Later as PCs came into being, and were networked together, VM and Time-sharing was abandoned.

Servers started to grow in power and floor space, more and more servers where added for different functions. It was one server per process so that the crash of one program would not affect any others. But as the number of servers grew so did their power consumption and cooling bill.

Then it was found that a typical server was only being used 10 to 15% of the time, most of the other time was spent waiting for an external event. So in order to reduce costs VM returned, one physical server could become several VM servers thus increasing efficiency. But it was a tricky road to getting computers that were not made for VM to work with it. Special software was developed to allow different instances of a server to run as well as different Operating Systems too.

One of the most important aspects of VM now is it’s ability to protect your business during a disaster. Because you don’t need the floor space, power requirements or A/C it’s much easier to install a backup VM server at a remote location. It has all the software and OS’s needed and is updated on a regular basis from the VM server at the office. It’s not just data backup but a complete system backup allowing your company to continue to operate if the office and all your servers are not available due to fire, flood or what ever.

So that former Radio now TV IT guy was installing VM software on servers located at the transmitter. The system is updated once a day in the wee hours keeping it current. They have high speed data lines connecting the office to the transmitter and if they need to use the VM server at the transmitter they can setup shop somewhere that they can connect to it on a WAN and keep billing customers and doing payroll.

Now there are somethings you can’t use VM for, such as video editing and on-air playout, for those you still want dedicated computers since you can’t have any delays in processing.

Well thats what I learned today, I hope you found it interesting.

2 people like this post.
Share

Cable wants you to BOX it

February 10th, 2012

Apparently cable companies are asking the FCC to require that they “must” encode their basic tier cable offerings in the name of cost cutting and control of their cable signal. If the FCC did then all cable subscribers would be required to rent a cable box from their cable company, and pay them a monthly fee.

Boxee (a maker of OTT boxes themselves) is asking the FCC to reject this request on the grounds that it is just a ploy to keep companies like themselves from attaching to and recording cable shows, as well as increase profits with cable box fees. Even the CEA is on Boxee side in this.

Now Boxee has been at the forefront of the Cable Cutter movement by introducing a new Boxee with a built-in Over-the-Air tuner as well as it’s internet offerings. So this makes sense for Boxee to push this to the point where they visited the FCC and it’s Chairman to make their case.

What Boxee and the CEA want is a road map to IP deliver of video to the consumer, a system that will allow any IP video entering the home to be able to connect easily to the home network. Remember the promise of the universal cable box, you could buy it in New York and when you moved to San Francisco you would be able to just move your box along with your other stuff and plug it in. Never happened due to the cable companies efforts, as I recall that was an FCC mandate that they found a way around.

With the next generation of video to the home Boxee and CEA want a common system that all can share in, without Cable holding all the strings.

Boxee Statement

FCC filing by the CEA

More comments to the FCC by the ALlVID Tech Company Alliance

 

1 person likes this post.
Share

Little Fiber

February 7th, 2012

ZWP F/O from Commscope

We are nearly ready to start pulling the Fiber Optic cable around the tower building. Ours is an armored cable with 12 strands that will run from 18 points back to the Telco room. But Paul brought in a F/O cable that Astound was installing at his station, it to carries 12 strands and it has an aluminum jacket. The big deal about this cable is it’s bend radius. Our F/O cable has a bend radius of 18 inches, this one is 5 inches, that makes for a much easier install.

We opened up this new F/O cable to see it’s strands, we could see they where

Smaller fiber

much smaller/thinner than the one’s in the cable we are using. These are both Commscope cables the new one is their ZWP or Zereo Water Peak that has a smooth attenuation responce.

 

Comparing Fiber sizes

 

 

1 person likes this post.
Share

Getting your eyes examined

January 9th, 2012

Improper and proper termination affect the appearance of an eye diagramExamining an eye pattern can tell you a lot about a digital transmission, be it on a PC board or an HD-SDI signal. The more you know about eyes the better.

Read it here.

Be the first to like.
Share

First White Space Device (Better update your FCC data)

December 23rd, 2011

KTS Wireless white space radio

The FCC has approved the first device to utilize the so called TV White Spaces, the unused spectrum next to active TV channels. The company is Koos Technical Services or KTS and their product is only approved for Wilmington, NC  until they work out the bugs with testing and see how cooperation with wireless mic users in the area works out.

Don’t forget to update your FCC microwave data, now that this has started!

Here what KTS has to say about their product:

AWR (Agility White Space Radio)

Description:

The Agility White Space Radio (AWR) includes 3 models that support either the VHF, UHF or 902-928 MHz/Unlicensed frequency bands. The AWR is approved as a fixed TV band Device (TVBD) under Part 15, Subpart H of the FCC Rules as well as an unlicensed radio for the 900 MHz band. A wide variety of applications are supported including Video Surveillance, SCADA and broadband wireless Internet access. The radio may be used to create Point-to-Point (PTP), Point-to-Mulitipoint (PTM) or simplex (one-way) networks with support for any type of IP traffic including voice or video. The AWR will be approved to operate with the FCC-approved database server provided by Spectrum Bridge, Inc (SBI). A database client is provided in the AWR. This server automatically assigns the operating frequency to all WSRs within a network based on location and TV channel availability.

 

Be the first to like.
Share

U-verse and Comcast

December 16th, 2011

I am finally upgrading my home/office internet connection, I have been using AT&T DSL since we moved in here and last I checked we were getting about 2.3MB/s download and around 400KB/s upload. The upload makes a big difference when I have to upload an new video to the web site. So now we are moving to Uverse and getting 12MB/s down and 1.5MB/s up along with two phone lines for $90/month.I know that AT&T has installed fiber in my neighborhood and  they are offering to bring it into my home. I am not sure that this upgrade will involve fiber to my home or not, I will keep you informed.

They tried real hard to get me to also take their Uverse cable or video or whatever you call it, maybe OTT (over the top). But I told them no, that as much as I may dislike Comcast as a customer they server a purpose, their headend is at the tower and I feed them a direct line from the transmitter. If we go off the air I can tune us in on Comcast cable and if we are still there then I know the problem is with the transmitter, but if Comcast is dark then it’s coming from the studio that way. It’s an invaluable tool seeing how I am the entire engineering department. So no Uverse cable or whatever for me.

Be the first to like.
Share